Imagination - Revision history

HansaThapliyal at 07:31, 19 March 2018

2018-03-19T07:31:51Z

HansaThapliyal at 07:31, 19 March 2018

2018-03-19T07:31:10Z

HansaThapliyal at 11:10, 3 January 2015

2015-01-03T11:10:32Z

HansaThapliyal at 19:39, 20 February 2012

2012-02-20T19:39:32Z

HansaThapliyal at 19:37, 20 February 2012

2012-02-20T19:37:53Z

HansaThapliyal at 09:14, 19 February 2012

2012-02-19T09:14:06Z

HansaThapliyal at 09:13, 19 February 2012

2012-02-19T09:13:01Z

HansaThapliyal at 09:11, 19 February 2012

2012-02-19T09:11:29Z

HansaThapliyal at 17:14, 25 October 2011

2011-10-25T17:14:46Z

HansaThapliyal at 17:10, 25 October 2011

2011-10-25T17:10:41Z

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 and what did the circus and other fairground entertainments give our imaginations, the great escapes the dream world with animals? rough, brute and still dream like? what was it about these dreams?
-https://scroll.in/magazine/814345/meet-the-australian-entertainers-who-enchanted-india-long-before-cable-tv
+[https://scroll.in/magazine/814345/meet-the-australian-entertainers-who-enchanted-india-long-before-cable-tv]
 How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no [[water babies]] exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 19 March 2018
Line 22:		Line 22:

	wrote in his children's book( which I have read) Water Babies..		wrote in his children's book( which I have read) Water Babies..
		+	----------------
		+
		+	and what did the circus and other fairground entertainments give our imaginations, the great escapes the dream world with animals? rough, brute and still dream like? what was it about these dreams?
		+	https://scroll.in/magazine/814345/meet-the-australian-entertainers-who-enchanted-india-long-before-cable-tv

	How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no [[water babies]] exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.		How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no [[water babies]] exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 3 January 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:
	[http://vcande.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-were-characteristics-of-mid-19th.html]		[http://vcande.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-were-characteristics-of-mid-19th.html]
	--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[[romantics in oil]] [[egg albumen]] [[silver grain]] [[ropes]] to [[circus skies]] where [[celestial beings]] [[moustaches]]		--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[[romantics in oil]] [[egg albumen]] [[silver grain]] [[ropes]] to [[circus skies]] where [[celestial beings]] [[moustaches]]
		+
		+	---------
		+	[[Imagining the wiki city]]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 [[griffins]] [[alchemists]] [[technologists]] [[monster technologies]] [[drowned cities]]
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Charles Darwin was a reverend, but encouraging of Darwin's preview copy of Origin of the Species, that he read. He felt his own observations of nature made him believe that species were not locked or permanant states of being
+Charles Kingsley was a reverend, but encouraging of Darwin's preview copy of Origin of the Species, that he read. He felt his own observations of nature made him believe that species were not locked or permanant states of being
 wrote in his children's book( which I have read) Water Babies..
-How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no water babies exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.
+How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no [[water babies]] exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.
 though this seems the most regular defence of story telling and perhaps not to do with having a different view of Darwin's scientific theory.
 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunstformen_der_Natur] Haeckel's illustrations of radiolarians
-Look for Darwin's description of a swimming black bear that becomes a whale in Origin of the Species
+Look for Darwin's description of a [[swimming black bear that becomes a whale]] in Origin of the Species
 Link to online discussion about imaging of scientific theories in the 19th century, with specific reference to Origin of the Species
 [http://vcande.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-were-characteristics-of-mid-19th.html]
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[[romantics in oil]] [[egg albumen]] [[silver grain]] [[ropes]] to [[circus skies]] where [[celestial beings]] [[moustaches]]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-[[griffins]] [[alchemists]] [[technologists]] [[monster technologies]]
+[[griffins]] [[alchemists]] [[technologists]] [[monster technologies]] [[drowned cities]]
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Charles Darwin was a reverend, but encouraging of Darwin's preview copy of Origin of the Species, that he read. He felt his own observations of nature made him believe that species were not locked or permanant states of being

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 Akin to the connection that atpatesvar makes between the growth of the embryo in the womb- its becoming unicellular, multicellular, a waterbeing, then an amphibian, before it becomes a mammal an over emphasis on this, or a literal emphasis, was discredited later.. but it was an influential idea. in the field of education, in the same time, Herbert Spencer wrote     If there be an order in which the human race has mastered its various kinds of knowledge, there will arise in every child an aptitude to acquire these kinds of knowledge in the same order.... Education is a repetition of civilization in little.
-[[gargoyles]] [[alchemists]] [[technologists]] [[monster technologies]] [[romantics in oil]] [[egg albumen]] [[silver grain]] [[ropes]] to [[circus skies]] where [[celestial beings]] [[moustaches
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-]]
+[[gargoyles]] [[alchemists]] [[technologists]] [[monster technologies]]
 Charles Darwin was a reverend, but encouraging of Darwin's preview copy of Origin of the Species, that he read. He felt his own observations of nature made him believe that species were not locked or permanant states of being
@@ Line 31: / Line 32: @@
 Link to online discussion about imaging of scientific theories in the 19th century, with specific reference to Origin of the Species
 [http://vcande.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-were-characteristics-of-mid-19th.html]

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 25 October 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:
	though this seems the most regular defence of story telling and perhaps not to do with having a different view of Darwin's scientific theory.		though this seems the most regular defence of story telling and perhaps not to do with having a different view of Darwin's scientific theory.
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunstformen_der_Natur] Haeckel's illustrations of radiolarians		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunstformen_der_Natur] Haeckel's illustrations of radiolarians
		+
		+	Look for Darwin's description of a swimming black bear that becomes a whale in Origin of the Species
		+
		+	Link to online discussion about imaging of scientific theories in the 19th century, with specific reference to Origin of the Species
		+	[http://vcande.blogspot.com/2010/04/what-were-characteristics-of-mid-19th.html]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 claimed that
 claiming that an individual organism's biological development, or ontogeny, parallels and summarizes its species' evolutionary development, or phylogeny.
-Akin to the connection that atpatesvar makes between the growth of the embryo in the womb- its becoming unicellular, multicellular, a waterbeing, then an amphibian, before it becomes a mammal an over emphasis on this, or a literal emphasis, was discredited later.. but it was an influential idea. in the field of education, in the same time, Herbert Spencer wrote     If there be an order in which the human race has mastered its various kinds of knowledge, there will arise in every child an aptitude to acquire these kinds of knowledge in the same order.... Education is a repetition of civilization in little.[13] — Herbert Spencer
+Akin to the connection that atpatesvar makes between the growth of the embryo in the womb- its becoming unicellular, multicellular, a waterbeing, then an amphibian, before it becomes a mammal an over emphasis on this, or a literal emphasis, was discredited later.. but it was an influential idea. in the field of education, in the same time, Herbert Spencer wrote     If there be an order in which the human race has mastered its various kinds of knowledge, there will arise in every child an aptitude to acquire these kinds of knowledge in the same order.... Education is a repetition of civilization in little.
 Charles Darwin was a reverend, but encouraging of Darwin's preview copy of Origin of the Species, that he read. He felt his own observations of nature made him believe that species were not locked or permanant states of being
-wrote in his children's boo( which I have read) Water Babies..
+wrote in his children's book( which I have read) Water Babies..
 How do you know that? Have you been there to see? And if you had been there to see, and had seen none, that would not prove that there were none ... And no one has a right to say that no water babies exist till they have seen no water babies existing, which is quite a different thing, mind, from not seeing water babies.