A sort of legendary organism - Revision history

HansaThapliyal at 04:00, 30 March 2015

2015-03-30T04:00:05Z

HansaThapliyal at 07:28, 29 March 2015

2015-03-29T07:28:38Z

HansaThapliyal at 00:50, 28 August 2013

2013-08-28T00:50:17Z

HansaThapliyal at 03:26, 26 August 2013

2013-08-26T03:26:08Z

HansaThapliyal at 05:10, 25 August 2013

2013-08-25T05:10:42Z

HansaThapliyal at 08:23, 23 July 2013

2013-07-23T08:23:41Z

HansaThapliyal at 08:23, 23 July 2013

2013-07-23T08:23:21Z

HansaThapliyal at 05:39, 12 February 2013

2013-02-12T05:39:58Z

HansaThapliyal at 05:13, 6 July 2009

2009-07-06T05:13:36Z

HansaThapliyal at 05:09, 6 July 2009

2009-07-06T05:09:44Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 30 March 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:


−	making a city of stories- make it like the skanda purana, in tamil also called the scrap purana- written over hundreds of years, stories added and added and added to it, small ref to skanda purana here, for this http://www.nasikchitpavan.org/history-of-chitpavans.php	+	making a city of stories- make it like the [[skanda purana]], in tamil also called the scrap purana- written over hundreds of years, stories added and added and added to it, small ref to skanda purana here, for this http://www.nasikchitpavan.org/history-of-chitpavans.php

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 29 March 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:

	[[intersecting glances]] calvino		[[intersecting glances]] calvino
		+
		+
		+	making a city of stories- make it like the skanda purana, in tamil also called the scrap purana- written over hundreds of years, stories added and added and added to it, small ref to skanda purana here, for this http://www.nasikchitpavan.org/history-of-chitpavans.php

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 28 August 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	creating the imaginary.. [[Natya Shastra]]		creating the imaginary.. [[Natya Shastra]]
		+
		+
	[[and the pro geny]]		[[and the pro geny]]

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 26 August 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Flann O' Brien		Flann O' Brien

		+	creating the imaginary.. [[Natya Shastra]]
	[[and the pro geny]]		[[and the pro geny]]

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 25 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	If I paint you a still life(-remember, you are no longer the patron, I am now the one with the money and the 'taste'-) if I do you this favour, you must understand that this canvas can be placed beside any similar 'natural' object, a flower, a shell, a leaf, in competition, not in imitation. A shell, in its accidents, is the phenomenal expression of a design the meaning of which is not accessible to us but which is rigid, logical, co ordinated, formed according to a morphology that trascends our understanding of these terms. In the human scale, my painting must inevitably exhibit the same characteristics- under my own control and use of light, pigment, canvas, form, texture, colour, chroma, value, sense, line, impasto and chiarascuro. These..events are... organised to produce not merely a symbol, a decor, but a.. sort of legendary organism which is to be appreciated and can only be judged in terms of itself.	+	If I paint you a still life(-remember, you are no longer the patron, I am now the one with the money and the 'taste'-) if I do you this favour, you must understand that this canvas can be placed beside any similar 'natural' object, a flower, a shell, a leaf, in competition, not in imitation. A [[shell]], in its accidents, is the phenomenal expression of a design the meaning of which is not accessible to us but which is rigid, logical, co ordinated, formed according to a morphology that trascends our understanding of these terms. In the human scale, my painting must inevitably exhibit the same characteristics- under my own control and use of light, pigment, canvas, form, texture, colour, chroma, value, sense, line, impasto and chiarascuro. These..events are... organised to produce not merely a symbol, a decor, but a.. sort of legendary organism which is to be appreciated and can only be judged in terms of itself.
	That is all I can really say.		That is all I can really say.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Flann O' Brien
-[and the pro geny]
+[[and the pro geny]]
 " like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the limits of his knowledge. When the matter lies outside conventional priestly wisdom, the views he expounds are possibly his own, quite idiosyncratic- which is not to say, ill considered- solutions to questions that have puzzled him also. The anthropologists problem, then, is not a poverty of exegesis, but its profusion, improvisation, and consequent diversity " Jonathan P Parry
 [[intersecting glances]] calvino

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 12 February 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	" like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the limits of his knowledge. When the matter lies outside conventional priestly wisdom, the views he expounds are possibly his own, quite idiosyncratic- which is not to say, ill considered- solutions to questions that have puzzled him also. The anthropologists problem, then, is not a poverty of exegesis, but its profusion, improvisation, and consequent diversity " Jonathan P Parry		" like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the limits of his knowledge. When the matter lies outside conventional priestly wisdom, the views he expounds are possibly his own, quite idiosyncratic- which is not to say, ill considered- solutions to questions that have puzzled him also. The anthropologists problem, then, is not a poverty of exegesis, but its profusion, improvisation, and consequent diversity " Jonathan P Parry
		+
		+	[[intersecting glances]] calvino

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 6 July 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:


−	" like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the ~~(outer)~~ limits of his knowledge" Jonathan P Parry	+	" like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the limits of his knowledge. When the matter lies outside conventional priestly wisdom, the views he expounds are possibly his own, quite idiosyncratic- which is not to say, ill considered- solutions to questions that have puzzled him also. The anthropologists problem, then, is not a poverty of exegesis, but its profusion, improvisation, and consequent diversity " Jonathan P Parry

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 6 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Flann O' Brien		Flann O' Brien
		+
		+
		+	" like many authorities, he would sometimes sooner extemporise, than reveal the (outer) limits of his knowledge" Jonathan P Parry